PDA

View Full Version : Problems seeing photos on cache page



StickBouncer
8th October 2013, 10:35 AM
I have just had my GC4PQZE Multi-cache Losing My Religion - Cover Versions which is a photo trail where finders have to go 8 co-ordinates and see which photo was taken from that location. if they are correct this will lead to the location of the final and log book.

My problem is I and some other cachers can see the required pictures when viewing the cache page but some cachers have reported that they are unable to see the photos and thus can not complete the cache.

I guess the reviewer could see them in order to publish the cache. I wrote the page using HTML codes and the photos are published on my flicker page and I down loaded them to the cache page gallery. The reviewer has since removed the logs that I downloaded them with and they are no longer displayed in the gallery.

Any ideas what is going wrong and more importantly how do I fix it.

PLEASE HELP if you can.

If you look at the page please let me know if you can see the pictures

Thanks

Mark

eusty
8th October 2013, 11:31 AM
No problems here...

StickBouncer
8th October 2013, 11:42 AM
Thanks for that. It has been suggested that it could be the browser that is being used as it seems okay on Firefox and chrome but not on Internet Explorer.

Maple Leaf
8th October 2013, 05:38 PM
I can see them ok (Firefox on MacOS and on iPad)

I have done a couple of caches like that near me and also have the images set out on a A4 page that can be printed - rather than printing them as part of the cache listing (See GC33W52 & GC1WBA4)

So you might want to try that as an option.

StickBouncer
8th October 2013, 05:53 PM
seems like GC hamsters may have somehow now put this right for me as the HTML codes have been changed.

Please let me know if there are still any problems.

Many thanks for all the help and advice

countrymatters
9th October 2013, 06:45 PM
Okay images on my iPad.

searchjaunt
23rd November 2014, 09:04 AM
If I open the photos seperately in Chrome, they show rather big. Is there a reason why they need to be so large? You see on the web page that the're scaled down anyway, so I don't see a reason why they need to be that large.