Thanks:
0
-
24th August 2008, 12:14 PM
#1
When is a new cache not a new cache?
A local cacher offered his caches up for adoption last autumn but now isn't responding to emails and hasn't logged into his account for months. Since forced adoption is a thing of the past the only option for getting one going again is for it to be archived and the adopter submitting a new listing and this is starting to happen. So it's same cache name, container (maybe) and coordinates but a different waypoint - if you had found the original cache would you log the 'new' one?
We all play the game differently, just interested in opinions.
MBF
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules