Thanks Thanks:  1
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Navicache - is it just me?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Alan White Guest

    Default Navicache - is it just me?

    In order to widen my horizon a bit I thought I'd create a Navicache account. Thinking about it was the only easy part .

    I filled in the form but it wouldn't accept the "&" I wanted to put in the first name. No problem, I changed it to "and". But then it wouldn't accept the CAPTCHA word even though I could clearly see it was correct and the same as it had previously been (which it says it wouldn't be). I tried a couple more times to submit it and then it said "too many attempts try again in 30 seconds".

    So I waited a couple of minutes and then successfully created the account after refreshing the page because it was still showing the previous information even though I was using a new IE window.

    But the verification email didn't arrive and on checking the form I found I'd put "@@" in the email field. No problem, I thought, I'll just log in and fix it. Nope, NC won't even let you log in until the account has been verified. Catch-22.

    So I've sent them an email and I'll see what happens.

    And during this whole process I several times received the "too many attempts try again in 30 seconds" message. If I can only use NC a few pages at a time then it's not much use.

    Fine, so the error in email address was mine but if I hadn't needed to enter the information several times then I might not have made it. And the page doesn't refresh properly, and the 30 seconds limit is really daft.

    Not impressed so far, and I haven't even managed to look at any caches yet .

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    0

    Default

    I had no problems registering myself.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Church Warsop, Notts
    Posts
    518

    Default

    I don't remember having any particular problems, but Navicache is a rather basic and old-fashioned web site so it doesn't surprise me that there are bugs. Quaint and charming, I'm tempted to say.

    I imagine it's run by some bloke in his spare time. And he probably only logs on if someone reports that the site is down.

    Apologies to Navicache Inc., if it's actually a Groundspeak-style corporation with huge swanky offices in Texas.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Warfield, Berkshire
    Posts
    436

    Default

    I think, Alan, as well as having 99% of the caches and 99% of the cachers, Groundspeak has 99% of the resources to create an all-singing all-dancing site.

    You've been spoiled for too long, time for some hardship Well, tongue is in cheek of course because all the listing sites are merely a means to an end, namely..... Tupperware!

    The other listing sites are definitely primitive and clunky in comparison to Groundspeak, the "30 seconds" problem on Navicache is surely a "legacy" feature that should have been ripped out when tabbed browsers were invented and you could open a dozen cache listings in 30 seconds.

    However, for life in the slow lane you can't beat Terracaching. I think the database server is a Nintendo Gameboy because the front end times out at peak periods and gives a ghastly "500 server error" which roughly translates to "Please come back later when the Americans are sleeping".

  5. #5
    Alan White Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sandvika View Post
    You've been spoiled for too long, time for some hardship
    You may be right, but it won't be any hardship . Two days on and I've had no reply either to the message about the problem above or to the two forum messages. It isn't me that loses out as a result: just Navicache and therefore listing site competition.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Surrey, near Heathrow
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alan White View Post
    It isn't me that loses out as a result: just Navicache and therefore listing site competition.
    To answer your original question "Is it just me", no, it's not just you.

    The NaviCache site is nothing like as good as the Groundspeak site, even with the small number of caches it lists. With the same volume of caches as Groundspeak list, the NaviCache site would be unusable. There is no doubt that this is a major concern to me, because as things stand I don't think it is up to the job of providing an effective alternative if Groundspeak do something to seriously alienate a large number of users. Whether or not it would be in a position to respond to such an event by making improvements is a moot point - I fear it probably wouldn't, but I'd love to be wrong.

    HOWEVER. While it's certainly not just you, it might be a little bit you . The vast majority of people have no difficulty joining, but the attitude of most people who join is probably a great deal less negative than I suspect yours was even before you hit these problems. With a negative attitude you are more likely to hit problems and less likely to resolve them.

    It's a shame you've had no response to your email. I have raised issues 3 times and have had replies twice. So they don't always manage to respond - I'm pretty sure there are no full time employees, maybe the person concerned was on holiday and missed the forum messages, I don't know. But I have a worse response ratio from Groundspeak, and they have a lot more resources than NaviCache.

    I'll go and have a look at the NaviCache forum later and see if there is anything I can contribute.

    Rgds, Andy

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Wokingham, UK
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Alan -you think this is bad?
    you tried cists? (and I'm not talking medical stuff) :-)

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Wiltshire
    Posts
    5,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Dewdrop View Post
    Alan -you think this is bad?
    you tried cists? (and I'm not talking medical stuff) :-)
    Les cistes
    ​​Do not go gentle into that good night.
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light. (Dylan Thomas)​


  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    here of course
    Posts
    640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill D (wwh) View Post
    Thats cool there are 7 in Wales :cheers:

  10. #10
    Icenians Guest

    Default

    I think there are some rather unfair comparisons between Navicache and GC going on here. There have, in GC's history, been times when it han't been able to cope and as a company GC has upgraded it's servers to manage.

    I think it's a little unfair to expect anyone to start out with a fully fledged system that is ready to cope on the off chance that everyone has a hissy fit with a competitor. The Navicache servers and system I'm sure were fine at the outset and given the activity level on them they see no reason to throw more money at something, again on the off chance that GC users decide to switch.

    We don't do it that way in business so I fail to see why we should expect a small group do it from their home.

    At the end of the day this game is about going outside, finding a box hidden somewhere nice, and logging it on a website. There are only two things required of any listing site to do that

    1. List the locations of boxes
    2. Allow you to log a find against it

    All the rest is fluff and not really necessary.

    GC has lots of revenue from folk that use the site to plough back into funding it's servers. The other sites have very little of that.

    As to getting a response. GC has many voulntary reviewers and users to respond to direct emails or via forums. Navicache doesn't have anything like the same numbers.

    I woud suggest that had Alan not entered too many '@' in the email address then perhaps his whole experience at signing up may have been less dissapointing

    Us software developers can't second guess every mistake a user makes

    Kev

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Surrey, near Heathrow
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Hi Kev,

    Re-reading my post it does look more negative than I meant it to be. I was trying to be realistic about the current situation without noting the reasons for it. I agree with your post.

    Rgds, Andy

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Longformacus
    Posts
    316

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Icenians View Post
    There have, in GC's history, been times when it han't been able to cope and as a company GC has upgraded it's servers to manage.

    Very true, I remember it well.
    Last edited by jacobite; 26th January 2009 at 03:34 PM.
    I'm just going outside, and may be some time!

    www.jacobitecaching.co.uk

  13. #13
    Alan White Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Icenians View Post
    I woud suggest that had Alan not entered too many '@' in the email address then perhaps his whole experience at signing up may have been less dissapointing
    Sorry, that's not so. The mistake was made on, if I recall correctly, my fourth attempt to complete the form, the previous three having failed because of unnecessary validation of the first name and NC's failure to generate a new CAPTCHA image.

    And four days on, still no response to either forum or direct messages.

    I do agree with the rest of the post, though .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •