There seems to have been some discussion about the validity of the current election process

How about this as a way round the arguments. I know it's not strictly in line with the original, agreed process but it could be a small price to pay for peace and quiet.

Now that Tim has resigned from the chair we are looking for a total of 6 people to run the shop. Including already elected members we have 8 people willing to devote their time and effort to GAGB. How's about we have ALL EIGHT of them and dispense with the elections all together?

They would be totally responsible for choosing a chairman from amongst themselves.

So we have 8 rather than 6 but, what the hell! Surely it's better than what we have at the moment.

I suggest that we DON'T hold a poll on this suggestion, rather general consensus of the replies will determine its outcome.

Comments?....................................