Thanks Thanks:  7
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Permission denied - Norwich City Walls

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    foreverlost77 Guest

    Default Permission denied - Norwich City Walls

    I had planned on doing a series of heritage caches in Norwich, with some based near parts of the old city walls (strictly not within or too close). Just to let you know that sadly permission has been denied, I didn't realise they were classed as Scheduled Ancient Monuments until the response was given though. Here's a quick copy and paste from the letter:

    "I have now consulted with our buildings conservation people, and I need
    to advise that they would not be prepared to authorise a geocache in the
    vicinity of the city walls.

    Although it is appreciated that you intend to avoid locating the
    geocache within the walls themselves, there may be a risk that people
    looking for the cache might, however inadvertently, disturb the fabric
    of the walls, which are a Scheduled Ancient Monument.

    I regret that we are unable to grant your request on this occasion."

    It's such a shame, as Norwich has a fair few 'Boom Blocks/towers' in place and old flint city border walls, and we discovered a really beautiful set of towers and occompanying wall not far from ours. It's a real shame we can't share them with others through geocaching...times like this when I wish virtual caches were still allowed
    Last edited by foreverlost77; 8th June 2010 at 02:57 PM.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Chippenham, Wiltshire
    Posts
    2,145

    Default

    Thanks for letting me know, I've added this to the database. Can you let me have landowner contact details by mail/PM for the records please?


    Caching since 2001
    Founder member of GAGB (2003)
    Committee (2003-2013)
    Chair of GAGB (2010-2012)
    Negotiator of 18 Landowner Agreements
    GAGB Friend

  3. #3
    bearhugger Guest

    Default City Walls

    I was in York last week doing some caching and they have city walls dating back to roman times yet there is a "York City Walls Trail" series of caches along there. I would guess that these walls would come under the Ancient Monument schedule.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    696

    Default

    How about making it a series of Multis? they would only need 2 stages

    1. go to the wall/tower & find a number.
    2. go to N ab cd.efg , W hi jk.lmn, which is in a park or similar a hundred yards away.

    one positive (IMHO) affect of this is you could get the numbers from the historical info boards (I assume there are some) thereby forcing the cachers to learn about the history.

  5. #5
    foreverlost77 Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martybartfast View Post
    How about making it a series of Multis? they would only need 2 stages

    1. go to the wall/tower & find a number.
    2. go to N ab cd.efg , W hi jk.lmn, which is in a park or similar a hundred yards away.

    one positive (IMHO) affect of this is you could get the numbers from the historical info boards (I assume there are some) thereby forcing the cachers to learn about the history.

    You hit the nail on the head.....this is now what I'm hoping to achieve, although it may be a very spread out one. Because of the location of the structure I'd like to use, there isn't much else around it that hasn't already been covered. The info boards are only ones that tell you what centuries the walls were likely to have been built, no other info.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Land of the Bear and Ragged Staff!
    Posts
    854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bearhugger View Post
    I was in York last week doing some caching and they have city walls dating back to roman times yet there is a "York City Walls Trail" series of caches along there. I would guess that these walls would come under the Ancient Monument schedule.
    Read -somewhere, can't remember where- that York City Council were involved with these caches. They even got an article in the local York paper... (Cache setter is a 'Walls 'volunteer and cacher)
    I have a Geocaching problem...
    Work gets in the way!

    * Cache Walker -Caching by byway, not highway! CacheWalker.co.uk
    Walking and Caching in Warwickshire, Worcestershire, Gloucestershire areas

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    675

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bear and Ragged View Post
    Read -somewhere, can't remember where- that York City Council were involved with these caches. They even got an article in the local York paper... (Cache setter is a 'Walls 'volunteer and cacher)
    That is correct, York City Council gave permission for the caches (the walls are a Scheduled Monument). And the release of them (Publication) was timed to be as close as possible to the Press release being made

    Deci
    My post is my personal opinion and as such you do not have my permission to quote me outside of these forums!

    Dave
    Brenin Tegeingl
    Formerly known as Mancunian Pyrocacher on GC

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Church Warsop, Notts
    Posts
    518

    Default

    Assuming that the officials can't be persuaded to follow York's lead...

    Reading the reply from the official body (presumably), it appears that your proposed cache locations were within a few feet of the walls. Otherwise you wouldn't have been asking them, and they wouldn't have been worried about people checking the walls for hiding places.

    Wouldn't it still be feasible to set up the series, but site every cache at least (say) fifty metres from any Ancient Monument? You'd still have to get permission from assorted landowners, so it could still take months of negotiation; but at least you wouldn't have the complication of conservation requirements to contend with.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •