Now I'm more confused?

[Sven]

Just popped out to do a little series of four urban micros....

None of which have hints?

So do urban caches have to have a hint or not? Or is it simply down to the reviewer? I notice they were reviewed by a different person to who turned my "urban" one down.

When submitting a new urban cache do i have to include a hint, or not?

[martybartfast]

I only looked at the first one, but it looks like it should have a hint to me, it's about as urban as they come.

[Tek_Kaz]

Well my 'Urban' caches all have precise hints to enable cachers to locate them quickly at high muggle periods of the day. Mind you I think that I would supply hints anyway as it is one of the many facets of geocaching.

[Happy Humphrey]

It seems that your "urban" one has been approved now, so the conclusion has to be that the rule is no longer used.

I must say that a genuine urban cache with no hint or precise instructions is one I'd tend to avoid. It's OK a few times to spend half an hour trying to not look suspicious, but after a while it gets a bit tiresome. Particularly when you end up with no cache to show for all the malarky!

[Sven]

It seems that your "urban" one has been approved now, so the conclusion has to be that the rule is no longer used.

Oh, well blow me. I thought I'd added a clue, how bizarre. Although that cache wasn't urban. Well the same reviewer who was denying it authed it....So which is it?

I was repeatedly told before GAGB guidelines are rules...Has this changed?

**confused**