What would you do as an individual committee member to fight for a enthusiastic , relevant GAGB and keep the momentum going?
What would you do as an individual committee member to fight for a enthusiastic , relevant GAGB and keep the momentum going?
I personally intend to support GAGB by offering to run a GAGB event and helping to update the agreements database where it is needed. This opens some questions that we will need to address, for example where the landowner contact is no longer available then what do we do with that agreement? Does it get deleted and what happens to the caches that were placed under that agreement? However we are in the best position to do this since we hold the backup records, contact details and in most cases relationships which enabled agreements to be made.
More generally, I'd like to support GAGB to have a wider appeal in the caching community with the ideas and a initiatives that I hope "new blood" on the committee and renewed member support will bring.
Caching since 2001
Founder member of GAGB (2003)
Committee (2003-2013)
Chair of GAGB (2010-2012)
Negotiator of 18 Landowner Agreements
GAGB Friend
I personally would seek to update the site improve the standing of the GAGB and try to increase the Membership by actively getting out amongst the cachers where possible and trying to keep the committee and site in touch as much as time and the caching commutity will allow to to do.
I know I've said this before but I want EVERYONE to feel heard, listened to and their opinions to matter to the committee
Thanks
Dominic
I would say that the first decision from the GAGB should be - what are we going to be, moving forward?
At this point in time, that seems to be undecided.
I think that relying on a small number of individuals to generate momentum the perpetuate an organisation with a large body of members with diverse viewpoints probably won't work. What's needed is a snowball effect - where the enthusiasm of each member for the GAGB and what it offers multiplies as it rolls forward.
So, in my admittedly simplistic terms, I think the GAGB needs to focus on its service offering - offer the most useful services and tools that it can to the geocaching community so that the enthusiasm and momentum flows into the organisation from its members - rather than the opposite way round.
Of course the big question is - what services and tools would fuel that?
And at this stage I have to admit - that's a question I don't have any very good answers for - but I will continue to ponder and see what I can come up with
I have a clear view of what I'd like our association to become and this came out pretty comprehensively in our hustings for Chairman. I've been repeating myself in these hustings, inevitably.
I'm very much open to 13 alternative views being proposed by our other candidates because I don't have a monopoly on this! I would like to be able to compare, contrast and take the best parts to make the best coherent whole, but this is Maple Leaf's remit for which she has an excellent mandate
Though I've not been elected as Chairman, I believe I can share the big picture with our Chairman as a committee member if elected and help wherever is needed to get the necessary traction to make progress. I would rather enable progress in all areas rather than take ownership of one chunky topic - maybe if elected I could be our next Secretary?